arXiv:1908.01355
Separating Argument Structure from Logical Structure in AMR
원문 초록
The AMR (Abstract Meaning Representation) formalism for representing meaning of natural language sentences was not designed to deal with scope and quantifiers. By extending AMR with indices for contexts and formulating constraints on these contexts, a formalism is derived that makes correct prediction for inferences involving negation and bound variables. The attractive core predicate-argument structure of AMR is preserved. The resulting framework is similar to that of Discourse Representation Theory.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SBERT studies Meaning Representations: Decomposing Sentence Embeddings into Explainable Semantic Features
Abstract Meaning Representation for Hospital Discharge Summarization
Probing the Geometry of Truth: Consistency and Generalization of Truth Directions in LLMs Across Logical Transformations and Question Answering Tasks
CROC: Evaluating and Training T2I Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checks
Reassessing Graph Linearization for Sequence-to-sequence AMR Parsing: On the Advantages and Limitations of Triple-Based Encoding
FormalMATH: Benchmarking Formal Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.