Towards Realistic Individual Recourse and Actionable Explanations in Black-Box Decision Making Systems
원문 초록
Machine learning based decision making systems are increasingly affecting humans. An individual can suffer an undesirable outcome under such decision making systems (e.g. denied credit) irrespective of whether the decision is fair or accurate. Individual recourse pertains to the problem of providing an actionable set of changes a person can undertake in order to improve their outcome. We propose a recourse algorithm that models the underlying data distribution or manifold. We then provide a mechanism to generate the smallest set of changes that will improve an individual's outcome. This mechanism can be easily used to provide recourse for any differentiable machine learning based decision making system. Further, the resulting algorithm is shown to be applicable to both supervised classification and causal decision making systems. Our work attempts to fill gaps in existing fairness literature that have primarily focused on discovering and/or algorithmically enforcing fairness constraints on decision making systems. This work also provides an alternative approach to generating counterfactual explanations.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models
Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound
Artificial Delegates Resolve Fairness Issues in Perpetual Voting with Partial Turnout
Quantifying Fairness in LLMs Beyond Tokens: A Semantic and Statistical Perspective
Social Group Bias in AI Finance
CF-Seg: Counterfactuals meet Segmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.