Competing Models
원문 초록
Different agents need to make a prediction. They observe identical data, but have different models: they predict using different explanatory variables. We study which agent believes they have the best predictive ability -- as measured by the smallest subjective posterior mean squared prediction error -- and show how it depends on the sample size. With small samples, we present results suggesting it is an agent using a low-dimensional model. With large samples, it is generally an agent with a high-dimensional model, possibly including irrelevant variables, but never excluding relevant ones. We apply our results to characterize the winning model in an auction of productive assets, to argue that entrepreneurs and investors with simple models will be over-represented in new sectors, and to understand the proliferation of "factors" that explain the cross-sectional variation of expected stock returns in the asset-pricing literature.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
The use of cross validation in the analysis of designed experiments
Router-R1: Teaching LLMs Multi-Round Routing and Aggregation via Reinforcement Learning
Tuning the Right Foundation Models is What you Need for Partial Label Learning
Behavioral Augmentation of UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Large Language Models for Method Generation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.