The Winnability of Klondike Solitaire and Many Other Patience Games
원문 초록
Our ignorance of the winnability percentage of the solitaire card game `Klondike' has been described as "one of the embarrassments of applied mathematics". Klondike, the game in the Windows Solitaire program, is just one of many single-player card games, generically called 'patience' or 'solitaire' games, for which players have long wanted to know how likely a particular game is to be winnable. A number of different games have been studied empirically in the academic literature and by non-academic enthusiasts. Here we show that a single general purpose Artificial Intelligence program named `Solvitaire' can be used to determine the winnability percentage of 73 variants of 35 different single-player card games with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.1% or better. For example, we report the winnability of Klondike as 81.945%+/- 0.084% (in the `thoughtful' variant where the player knows the rank and suit of all cards), a 30-fold reduction in confidence interval over the best previous result. The vast majority of our results are either entirely new or represent significant improvements on previous knowledge.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Optimizing Hearthstone Agents using an Evolutionary Algorithm
Identifying and Clustering Counter Relationships of Team Compositions in PvP Games for Efficient Balance Analysis
AlphaDou: High-Performance End-to-End Doudizhu AI Integrating Bidding
Enhancing Commentary Strategies for Imperfect Information Card Games: A Study of Large Language Models in Guandan Commentary
GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluations
DanZero+: Dominating the GuanDan Game through Reinforcement Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.