Is Attention Interpretable?
원문 초록
Attention mechanisms have recently boosted performance on a range of NLP tasks. Because attention layers explicitly weight input components' representations, it is also often assumed that attention can be used to identify information that models found important (e.g., specific contextualized word tokens). We test whether that assumption holds by manipulating attention weights in already-trained text classification models and analyzing the resulting differences in their predictions. While we observe some ways in which higher attention weights correlate with greater impact on model predictions, we also find many ways in which this does not hold, i.e., where gradient-based rankings of attention weights better predict their effects than their magnitudes. We conclude that while attention noisily predicts input components' overall importance to a model, it is by no means a fail-safe indicator.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specialized text classification: an approach to classifying Open Banking transactions
Universal Training of Neural Networks to Achieve Bayes Optimal Classification Accuracy
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation
PRL: Prompts from Reinforcement Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.