Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning
원문 초록
Multi-hop reading comprehension (RC) questions are challenging because they require reading and reasoning over multiple paragraphs. We argue that it can be difficult to construct large multi-hop RC datasets. For example, even highly compositional questions can be answered with a single hop if they target specific entity types, or the facts needed to answer them are redundant. Our analysis is centered on HotpotQA, where we show that single-hop reasoning can solve much more of the dataset than previously thought. We introduce a single-hop BERT-based RC model that achieves 67 F1---comparable to state-of-the-art multi-hop models. We also design an evaluation setting where humans are not shown all of the necessary paragraphs for the intended multi-hop reasoning but can still answer over 80% of questions. Together with detailed error analysis, these results suggest there should be an increasing focus on the role of evidence in multi-hop reasoning and possibly even a shift towards information retrieval style evaluations with large and diverse evidence collections.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
JointRank: Rank Large Set with Single Pass
From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
Exp4Fuse: A Rank Fusion Framework for Enhanced Sparse Retrieval using Large Language Model-based Query Expansion
Retrieval Augmented Generation based Large Language Models for Causality Mining
From Chaos to Automation: Enabling the Use of Unstructured Data for Robotic Process Automation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.