Disparate Vulnerability to Membership Inference Attacks
원문 초록
A membership inference attack (MIA) against a machine-learning model enables an attacker to determine whether a given data record was part of the model's training data or not. In this paper, we provide an in-depth study of the phenomenon of disparate vulnerability against MIAs: unequal success rate of MIAs against different population subgroups. We first establish necessary and sufficient conditions for MIAs to be prevented, both on average and for population subgroups, using a notion of distributional generalization. Second, we derive connections of disparate vulnerability to algorithmic fairness and to differential privacy. We show that fairness can only prevent disparate vulnerability against limited classes of adversaries. Differential privacy bounds disparate vulnerability but can significantly reduce the accuracy of the model. We show that estimating disparate vulnerability to MIAs by na\"ively applying existing attacks can lead to overestimation. We then establish which attacks are suitable for estimating disparate vulnerability, and provide a statistical framework for doing so reliably. We conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world data finding statistically significant evidence of disparate vulnerability in realistic settings. The code is available at https://github.com/spring-epfl/disparate-vulnerability
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Apollo: A Posteriori Label-Only Membership Inference Attack Towards Machine Unlearning
Automatic Calibration for Membership Inference Attack on Large Language Models
Orthogonal Soft Pruning for Efficient Class Unlearning
When Better Features Mean Greater Risks: The Performance-Privacy Trade-Off in Contrastive Learning
Membership Inference Attacks on Sequence Models
An Out-Of-Distribution Membership Inference Attack Approach for Cross-Domain Graph Attacks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.