Finite-time Analysis of Approximate Policy Iteration for the Linear Quadratic Regulator
원문 초록
We study the sample complexity of approximate policy iteration (PI) for the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), building on a recent line of work using LQR as a testbed to understand the limits of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms on continuous control tasks. Our analysis quantifies the tension between policy improvement and policy evaluation, and suggests that policy evaluation is the dominant factor in terms of sample complexity. Specifically, we show that to obtain a controller that is within $\varepsilon$ of the optimal LQR controller, each step of policy evaluation requires at most $(n+d)^3/\varepsilon^2$ samples, where $n$ is the dimension of the state vector and $d$ is the dimension of the input vector. On the other hand, only $\log(1/\varepsilon)$ policy improvement steps suffice, resulting in an overall sample complexity of $(n+d)^3 \varepsilon^{-2} \log(1/\varepsilon)$. We furthermore build on our analysis and construct a simple adaptive procedure based on $\varepsilon$-greedy exploration which relies on approximate PI as a sub-routine and obtains $T^{2/3}$ regret, improving upon a recent result of Abbasi-Yadkori et al.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Sparse-Reg: Improving Sample Complexity in Offline Reinforcement Learning using Sparsity
DR-SAC: Distributionally Robust Soft Actor-Critic for Reinforcement Learning under Uncertainty
Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)
Scaling Algorithm Distillation for Continuous Control with Mamba
Reinforcement Learning via Implicit Imitation Guidance
Safe Planning and Policy Optimization via World Model Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.