Validating the Validation: Reanalyzing a large-scale comparison of Deep Learning and Machine Learning models for bioactivity prediction
원문 초록
Machine learning methods may have the potential to significantly accelerate drug discovery. However, the increasing rate of new methodological approaches being published in the literature raises the fundamental question of how models should be benchmarked and validated. We reanalyze the data generated by a recently published large-scale comparison of machine learning models for bioactivity prediction and arrive at a somewhat different conclusion. We show that the performance of support vector machines is competitive with that of deep learning methods. Additionally, using a series of numerical experiments, we question the relevance of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a metric in virtual screening, and instead suggest that area under the precision-recall curve should be used in conjunction with the receiver operating characteristic. Our numerical experiments also highlight challenges in estimating the uncertainty in model performance via scaffold-split nested cross validation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
B-XAIC Dataset: Benchmarking Explainable AI for Graph Neural Networks Using Chemical Data
Assay2Mol: large language model-based drug design using BioAssay context
PocketVina Enables Scalable and Highly Accurate Physically Valid Docking through Multi-Pocket Conditioning
Fast Bayesian Optimization of Function Networks with Partial Evaluations
Robust Molecular Property Prediction via Densifying Scarce Labeled Data
MTPNet: Multi-Grained Target Perception for Unified Activity Cliff Prediction
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.