Inferring Which Medical Treatments Work from Reports of Clinical Trials
원문 초록
How do we know if a particular medical treatment actually works? Ideally one would consult all available evidence from relevant clinical trials. Unfortunately, such results are primarily disseminated in natural language scientific articles, imposing substantial burden on those trying to make sense of them. In this paper, we present a new task and corpus for making this unstructured evidence actionable. The task entails inferring reported findings from a full-text article describing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with respect to a given intervention, comparator, and outcome of interest, e.g., inferring if an article provides evidence supporting the use of aspirin to reduce risk of stroke, as compared to placebo. We present a new corpus for this task comprising 10,000+ prompts coupled with full-text articles describing RCTs. Results using a suite of models --- ranging from heuristic (rule-based) approaches to attentive neural architectures --- demonstrate the difficulty of the task, which we believe largely owes to the lengthy, technical input texts. To facilitate further work on this important, challenging problem we make the corpus, documentation, a website and leaderboard, and code for baselines and evaluation available at http://evidence-inference.ebm-nlp.com/.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
AI Wizards at CheckThat! 2025: Enhancing Transformer-Based Embeddings with Sentiment for Subjectivity Detection in News Articles
Remember Past, Anticipate Future: Learning Continual Multimodal Misinformation Detectors
Narrative Shift Detection: A Hybrid Approach of Dynamic Topic Models and Large Language Models
Characterizing Linguistic Shifts in Croatian News via Diachronic Word Embeddings
How Grounded is Wikipedia? A Study on Structured Evidential Support
Intent Factored Generation: Unleashing the Diversity in Your Language Model
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.