Interpreting Black Box Models via Hypothesis Testing
원문 초록
In science and medicine, model interpretations may be reported as discoveries of natural phenomena or used to guide patient treatments. In such high-stakes tasks, false discoveries may lead investigators astray. These applications would therefore benefit from control over the finite-sample error rate of interpretations. We reframe black box model interpretability as a multiple hypothesis testing problem. The task is to discover "important" features by testing whether the model prediction is significantly different from what would be expected if the features were replaced with uninformative counterfactuals. We propose two testing methods: one that provably controls the false discovery rate but which is not yet feasible for large-scale applications, and an approximate testing method which can be applied to real-world data sets. In simulation, both tests have high power relative to existing interpretability methods. When applied to state-of-the-art vision and language models, the framework selects features that intuitively explain model predictions. The resulting explanations have the additional advantage that they are themselves easy to interpret.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Minimax Optimal Two-Sample Testing under Local Differential Privacy
Model Equality Testing: Which Model Is This API Serving?
General Frameworks for Conditional Two-Sample Testing
Credal Two-Sample Tests of Epistemic Uncertainty
Machine Learning for Two-Sample Testing under Right-Censored Data: A Simulation Study
Computational-Statistical Trade-off in Kernel Two-Sample Testing with Random Fourier Features
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.