A New Approach for Distributed Hypothesis Testing with Extensions to Byzantine-Resilience
원문 초록
We study a setting where a group of agents, each receiving partially informative private observations, seek to collaboratively learn the true state (among a set of hypotheses) that explains their joint observation profiles over time. To solve this problem, we propose a distributed learning rule that differs fundamentally from existing approaches, in the sense, that it does not employ any form of "belief-averaging". Specifically, every agent maintains a local belief (on each hypothesis) that is updated in a Bayesian manner without any network influence, and an actual belief that is updated (up to normalization) as the minimum of its own local belief and the actual beliefs of its neighbors. Under minimal requirements on the signal structures of the agents and the underlying communication graph, we establish consistency of the proposed belief update rule, i.e., we show that the actual beliefs of the agents asymptotically concentrate on the true state almost surely. As one of the key benefits of our approach, we show that our learning rule can be extended to scenarios that capture misbehavior on the part of certain agents in the network, modeled via the Byzantine adversary model. In particular, we prove that each non-adversarial agent can asymptotically learn the true state of the world almost surely, under appropriate conditions on the observation model and the network topology.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Minimax Optimal Two-Sample Testing under Local Differential Privacy
Model Equality Testing: Which Model Is This API Serving?
General Frameworks for Conditional Two-Sample Testing
Credal Two-Sample Tests of Epistemic Uncertainty
Machine Learning for Two-Sample Testing under Right-Censored Data: A Simulation Study
Computational-Statistical Trade-off in Kernel Two-Sample Testing with Random Fourier Features
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.