Recursive Subtree Composition in LSTM-Based Dependency Parsing
원문 초록
The need for tree structure modelling on top of sequence modelling is an open issue in neural dependency parsing. We investigate the impact of adding a tree layer on top of a sequential model by recursively composing subtree representations (composition) in a transition-based parser that uses features extracted by a BiLSTM. Composition seems superfluous with such a model, suggesting that BiLSTMs capture information about subtrees. We perform model ablations to tease out the conditions under which composition helps. When ablating the backward LSTM, performance drops and composition does not recover much of the gap. When ablating the forward LSTM, performance drops less dramatically and composition recovers a substantial part of the gap, indicating that a forward LSTM and composition capture similar information. We take the backward LSTM to be related to lookahead features and the forward LSTM to the rich history-based features both crucial for transition-based parsers. To capture history-based information, composition is better than a forward LSTM on its own, but it is even better to have a forward LSTM as part of a BiLSTM. We correlate results with language properties, showing that the improved lookahead of a backward LSTM is especially important for head-final languages.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Step-by-step Instructions and a Simple Tabular Output Format Improve the Dependency Parsing Accuracy of LLMs
Hierarchical Bracketing Encodings for Dependency Parsing as Tagging
An Aspect Extraction Framework using Different Embedding Types, Learning Models, and Dependency Structure
Multi-View Attention Syntactic Enhanced Graph Convolutional Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis
Top General Performance = Top Domain Performance? DomainCodeBench: A Multi-domain Code Generation Benchmark
Error Diversity Matters: An Error-Resistant Ensemble Method for Unsupervised Dependency Parsing
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.