Text Analysis in Adversarial Settings: Does Deception Leave a Stylistic Trace?
원문 초록
Textual deception constitutes a major problem for online security. Many studies have argued that deceptiveness leaves traces in writing style, which could be detected using text classification techniques. By conducting an extensive literature review of existing empirical work, we demonstrate that while certain linguistic features have been indicative of deception in certain corpora, they fail to generalize across divergent semantic domains. We suggest that deceptiveness as such leaves no content-invariant stylistic trace, and textual similarity measures provide superior means of classifying texts as potentially deceptive. Additionally, we discuss forms of deception beyond semantic content, focusing on hiding author identity by writing style obfuscation. Surveying the literature on both author identification and obfuscation techniques, we conclude that current style transformation methods fail to achieve reliable obfuscation while simultaneously ensuring semantic faithfulness to the original text. We propose that future work in style transformation should pay particular attention to disallowing semantically drastic changes.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation
PRL: Prompts from Reinforcement Learning
Guarded Query Routing for Large Language Models
The Ripple Effect: On Unforeseen Complications of Backdoor Attacks
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.