Contrasting Exploration in Parameter and Action Space: A Zeroth-Order Optimization Perspective
원문 초록
Black-box optimizers that explore in parameter space have often been shown to outperform more sophisticated action space exploration methods developed specifically for the reinforcement learning problem. We examine these black-box methods closely to identify situations in which they are worse than action space exploration methods and those in which they are superior. Through simple theoretical analyses, we prove that complexity of exploration in parameter space depends on the dimensionality of parameter space, while complexity of exploration in action space depends on both the dimensionality of action space and horizon length. This is also demonstrated empirically by comparing simple exploration methods on several model problems, including Contextual Bandit, Linear Regression and Reinforcement Learning in continuous control.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Sparse-Reg: Improving Sample Complexity in Offline Reinforcement Learning using Sparsity
DR-SAC: Distributionally Robust Soft Actor-Critic for Reinforcement Learning under Uncertainty
Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)
Scaling Algorithm Distillation for Continuous Control with Mamba
Self-Composing Policies for Scalable Continual Reinforcement Learning
CO-PILOT: COllaborative Planning and reInforcement Learning On sub-Task curriculum
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.