The Use of Unlabeled Data versus Labeled Data for Stopping Active Learning for Text Classification
원문 초록
Annotation of training data is the major bottleneck in the creation of text classification systems. Active learning is a commonly used technique to reduce the amount of training data one needs to label. A crucial aspect of active learning is determining when to stop labeling data. Three potential sources for informing when to stop active learning are an additional labeled set of data, an unlabeled set of data, and the training data that is labeled during the process of active learning. To date, no one has compared and contrasted the advantages and disadvantages of stopping methods based on these three information sources. We find that stopping methods that use unlabeled data are more effective than methods that use labeled data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Specialized text classification: an approach to classifying Open Banking transactions
Applying LLMs to Active Learning: Towards Cost-Efficient Cross-Task Text Classification without Manually Labeled Data
ICS: Total Freedom in Manual Text Classification Supported by Unobtrusive Machine Learning
Making Language Model a Hierarchical Classifier and Generator
Robustness of Misinformation Classification Systems to Adversarial Examples Through BeamAttack
Prompt Candidates, then Distill: A Teacher-Student Framework for LLM-driven Data Annotation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.