Generative Models from the perspective of Continual Learning
원문 초록
Which generative model is the most suitable for Continual Learning? This paper aims at evaluating and comparing generative models on disjoint sequential image generation tasks. We investigate how several models learn and forget, considering various strategies: rehearsal, regularization, generative replay and fine-tuning. We used two quantitative metrics to estimate the generation quality and memory ability. We experiment with sequential tasks on three commonly used benchmarks for Continual Learning (MNIST, Fashion MNIST and CIFAR10). We found that among all models, the original GAN performs best and among Continual Learning strategies, generative replay outperforms all other methods. Even if we found satisfactory combinations on MNIST and Fashion MNIST, training generative models sequentially on CIFAR10 is particularly instable, and remains a challenge. Our code is available online \footnote{\url{https://github.com/TLESORT/Generative\_Continual\_Learning}}.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
MFGDiffusion: Mask-Guided Smoke Synthesis for Enhanced Forest Fire Detection
Implementing Adaptations for Vision AutoRegressive Model
CharaConsist: Fine-Grained Consistent Character Generation
MGVQ: Could VQ-VAE Beat VAE? A Generalizable Tokenizer with Multi-group Quantization
LifelongPR: Lifelong knowledge fusion for point cloud place recognition based on replay and prompt learning
Rethinking Query-based Transformer for Continual Image Segmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.