Comparison of Discrete Choice Models and Artificial Neural Networks in Presence of Missing Variables
원문 초록
Classification, the process of assigning a label (or class) to an observation given its features, is a common task in many applications. Nonetheless in most real-life applications, the labels can not be fully explained by the observed features. Indeed there can be many factors hidden to the modellers. The unexplained variation is then treated as some random noise which is handled differently depending on the method retained by the practitioner. This work focuses on two simple and widely used supervised classification algorithms: discrete choice models and artificial neural networks in the context of binary classification. Through various numerical experiments involving continuous or discrete explanatory features, we present a comparison of the retained methods' performance in presence of missing variables. The impact of the distribution of the two classes in the training data is also investigated. The outcomes of those experiments highlight the fact that artificial neural networks outperforms the discrete choice models, except when the distribution of the classes in the training data is highly unbalanced. Finally, this work provides some guidelines for choosing the right classifier with respect to the training data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLSF - Learning Label Specific Features for Multi-Label Classifcation
PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches
Zero-Shot Multi-modal Large Language Model v.s. Supervised Deep Learning: A Comparative Study on CT-Based Intracranial Hemorrhage Subtyping
Detecting immune cells with label-free two-photon autofluorescence and deep learning
Adversarial Surrogate Risk Bounds for Binary Classification
Hidden Persuasion: Detecting Manipulative Narratives on Social Media During the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.