Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generation
원문 초록
When an image classifier makes a prediction, which parts of the image are relevant and why? We can rephrase this question to ask: which parts of the image, if they were not seen by the classifier, would most change its decision? Producing an answer requires marginalizing over images that could have been seen but weren't. We can sample plausible image in-fills by conditioning a generative model on the rest of the image. We then optimize to find the image regions that most change the classifier's decision after in-fill. Our approach contrasts with ad-hoc in-filling approaches, such as blurring or injecting noise, which generate inputs far from the data distribution, and ignore informative relationships between different parts of the image. Our method produces more compact and relevant saliency maps, with fewer artifacts compared to previous methods.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Counterfactual Influence as a Distributional Quantity
Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking
ViT-ProtoNet for Few-Shot Image Classification: A Multi-Benchmark Evaluation
MVNet: Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Vision Backbone Architecture
Beyond Accuracy: Metrics that Uncover What Makes a 'Good' Visual Descriptor
Linear Attention with Global Context: A Multipole Attention Mechanism for Vision and Physics
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.