Are generative deep models for novelty detection truly better?
원문 초록
Many deep models have been recently proposed for anomaly detection. This paper presents comparison of selected generative deep models and classical anomaly detection methods on an extensive number of non--image benchmark datasets. We provide statistical comparison of the selected models, in many configurations, architectures and hyperparamaters. We arrive to conclusion that performance of the generative models is determined by the process of selection of their hyperparameters. Specifically, performance of the deep generative models deteriorates with decreasing amount of anomalous samples used in hyperparameter selection. In practical scenarios of anomaly detection, none of the deep generative models systematically outperforms the kNN.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
SuperAD: A Training-free Anomaly Classification and Segmentation Method for CVPR 2025 VAND 3.0 Workshop Challenge Track 1: Adapt & Detect
Isolation Forest in Novelty Detection Scenario
Towards High-Resolution 3D Anomaly Detection: A Scalable Dataset and Real-Time Framework for Subtle Industrial Defects
Evaluating Language Models For Threat Detection in IoT Security Logs
mTSBench: Benchmarking Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection and Model Selection at Scale
Benchmarking Unsupervised Strategies for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.