Evaluating Active Learning Heuristics for Sequential Diagnosis
원문 초록
Given a malfunctioning system, sequential diagnosis aims at identifying the root cause of the failure in terms of abnormally behaving system components. As initial system observations usually do not suffice to deterministically pin down just one explanation of the system's misbehavior, additional system measurements can help to differentiate between possible explanations. The goal is to restrict the space of explanations until there is only one (highly probable) explanation left. To achieve this with a minimal-cost set of measurements, various (active learning) heuristics for selecting the best next measurement have been proposed. We report preliminary results of extensive ongoing experiments with a set of selection heuristics on real-world diagnosis cases. In particular, we try to answer questions such as "Is some heuristic always superior to all others?", "On which factors does the (relative) performance of the particular heuristics depend?" or "Under which circumstances should I use which heuristic?"
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Near-Polynomially Competitive Active Logistic Regression
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning
Info-Coevolution: An Efficient Framework for Data Model Coevolution
ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data Acquisition
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.