Characterizing multiple instance datasets
원문 초록
In many pattern recognition problems, a single feature vector is not sufficient to describe an object. In multiple instance learning (MIL), objects are represented by sets (\emph{bags}) of feature vectors (\emph{instances}). This requires an adaptation of standard supervised classifiers in order to train and evaluate on these bags of instances. Like for supervised classification, several benchmark datasets and numerous classifiers are available for MIL. When performing a comparison of different MIL classifiers, it is important to understand the differences of the datasets, used in the comparison. Seemingly different (based on factors such as dimensionality) datasets may elicit very similar behaviour in classifiers, and vice versa. This has implications for what kind of conclusions may be drawn from the comparison results. We aim to give an overview of the variability of available benchmark datasets and some popular MIL classifiers. We use a dataset dissimilarity measure, based on the differences between the ROC-curves obtained by different classifiers, and embed this dataset dissimilarity matrix into a low-dimensional space. Our results show that conceptually similar datasets can behave very differently. We therefore recommend examining such dataset characteristics when making comparisons between existing and new MIL classifiers. The datasets are available via Figshare at \url{https://bit.ly/2K9iTja}.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
The Trilemma of Truth in Large Language Models
OTSurv: A Novel Multiple Instance Learning Framework for Survival Prediction with Heterogeneity-aware Optimal Transport
Benchmarking histopathology foundation models in a multi-center dataset for skin cancer subtyping
MiCo: Multiple Instance Learning with Context-Aware Clustering for Whole Slide Image Analysis
HyperPath: Knowledge-Guided Hyperbolic Semantic Hierarchy Modeling for WSI Analysis
Do MIL Models Transfer?
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.