Comparing LBP, HOG and Deep Features for Classification of Histopathology Images
원문 초록
Medical image analysis has become a topic under the spotlight in recent years. There is a significant progress in medical image research concerning the usage of machine learning. However, there are still numerous questions and problems awaiting answers and solutions, respectively. In the present study, comparison of three classification models is conducted using features extracted using local binary patterns, the histogram of gradients, and a pre-trained deep network. Three common image classification methods, including support vector machines, decision trees, and artificial neural networks are used to classify feature vectors obtained by different feature extractors. We use KIMIA Path960, a publicly available dataset of $960$ histopathology images extracted from $20$ different tissue scans to test the accuracy of classification and feature extractions models used in the study, specifically for the histopathology images. SVM achieves the highest accuracy of $90.52\%$ using local binary patterns as features which surpasses the accuracy obtained by deep features, namely $81.14\%$.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
FedWSIDD: Federated Whole Slide Image Classification via Dataset Distillation
One Prototype Is Enough: Single-Prototype Activation for Interpretable Image Classification
Hyperspectral Image Classification via Transformer-based Spectral-Spatial Attention Decoupling and Adaptive Gating
MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI
Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms
Disentangled representations of microscopy images
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.