Did the Model Understand the Question?
원문 초록
We analyze state-of-the-art deep learning models for three tasks: question answering on (1) images, (2) tables, and (3) passages of text. Using the notion of \emph{attribution} (word importance), we find that these deep networks often ignore important question terms. Leveraging such behavior, we perturb questions to craft a variety of adversarial examples. Our strongest attacks drop the accuracy of a visual question answering model from $61.1\%$ to $19\%$, and that of a tabular question answering model from $33.5\%$ to $3.3\%$. Additionally, we show how attributions can strengthen attacks proposed by Jia and Liang (2017) on paragraph comprehension models. Our results demonstrate that attributions can augment standard measures of accuracy and empower investigation of model performance. When a model is accurate but for the wrong reasons, attributions can surface erroneous logic in the model that indicates inadequacies in the test data.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images
DrishtiKon: Multi-Granular Visual Grounding for Text-Rich Document Images
HRIBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Real-Time Human Perception in Human-Robot Interaction
Adapting Lightweight Vision Language Models for Radiological Visual Question Answering
SlotPi: Physics-informed Object-centric Reasoning Models
Outside Knowledge Conversational Video (OKCV) Dataset -- Dialoguing over Videos
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.