Do deep nets really need weight decay and dropout?
원문 초록
The impressive success of modern deep neural networks on computer vision tasks has been achieved through models of very large capacity compared to the number of available training examples. This overparameterization is often said to be controlled with the help of different regularization techniques, mainly weight decay and dropout. However, since these techniques reduce the effective capacity of the model, typically even deeper and wider architectures are required to compensate for the reduced capacity. Therefore, there seems to be a waste of capacity in this practice. In this paper we build upon recent research that suggests that explicit regularization may not be as important as widely believed and carry out an ablation study that concludes that weight decay and dropout may not be necessary for object recognition if enough data augmentation is introduced.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Explicitly Modeling Subcortical Vision with a Neuro-Inspired Front-End Improves CNN Robustness
RMNv2: Reduced Mobilenet V2 for CIFAR10
SenseShift6D: Multimodal RGB-D Benchmarking for Robust 6D Pose Estimation across Environment and Sensor Variations
AI-Enhanced Pediatric Pneumonia Detection: A CNN-Based Approach Using Data Augmentation and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
PSAT: Pediatric Segmentation Approaches via Adult Augmentations and Transfer Learning
DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Detecting Subjectivity via Transfer-Learning and Corrective Data Augmentation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.