Gold Standard Online Debates Summaries and First Experiments Towards Automatic Summarization of Online Debate Data
원문 초록
Usage of online textual media is steadily increasing. Daily, more and more news stories, blog posts and scientific articles are added to the online volumes. These are all freely accessible and have been employed extensively in multiple research areas, e.g. automatic text summarization, information retrieval, information extraction, etc. Meanwhile, online debate forums have recently become popular, but have remained largely unexplored. For this reason, there are no sufficient resources of annotated debate data available for conducting research in this genre. In this paper, we collected and annotated debate data for an automatic summarization task. Similar to extractive gold standard summary generation our data contains sentences worthy to include into a summary. Five human annotators performed this task. Inter-annotator agreement, based on semantic similarity, is 36% for Cohen's kappa and 48% for Krippendorff's alpha. Moreover, we also implement an extractive summarization system for online debates and discuss prominent features for the task of summarizing online debate data automatically.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Enhancing Automatic Term Extraction with Large Language Models via Syntactic Retrieval
InsertRank: LLMs can reason over BM25 scores to Improve Listwise Reranking
JointRank: Rank Large Set with Single Pass
From Web Search towards Agentic Deep Research: Incentivizing Search with Reasoning Agents
ImpliRet: Benchmarking the Implicit Fact Retrieval Challenge
DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agents
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.