Reporting Score Distributions Makes a Difference: Performance Study of LSTM-networks for Sequence Tagging
원문 초록
In this paper we show that reporting a single performance score is insufficient to compare non-deterministic approaches. We demonstrate for common sequence tagging tasks that the seed value for the random number generator can result in statistically significant (p < 10^-4) differences for state-of-the-art systems. For two recent systems for NER, we observe an absolute difference of one percentage point F1-score depending on the selected seed value, making these systems perceived either as state-of-the-art or mediocre. Instead of publishing and reporting single performance scores, we propose to compare score distributions based on multiple executions. Based on the evaluation of 50.000 LSTM-networks for five sequence tagging tasks, we present network architectures that produce both superior performance as well as are more stable with respect to the remaining hyperparameters.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Selecting and Merging: Towards Adaptable and Scalable Named Entity Recognition with Large Language Models
Label-Guided In-Context Learning for Named Entity Recognition
Named Entity Recognition in Historical Italian: The Case of Giacomo Leopardi's Zibaldone
A Comparative Analysis of Static Word Embeddings for Hungarian
Methods for Recognizing Nested Terms
Multimodal LLMs for OCR, OCR Post-Correction, and Named Entity Recognition in Historical Documents
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.