arXiv:1707.06875
공식 코드 · Papers with Code
Why We Need New Evaluation Metrics for NLG
원문 초록
The majority of NLG evaluation relies on automatic metrics, such as BLEU . In this paper, we motivate the need for novel, system- and data-independent automatic evaluation methods: We investigate a wide range of metrics, including state-of-the-art word-based and novel grammar-based ones, and demonstrate that they only weakly reflect human judgements of system outputs as generated by data-driven, end-to-end NLG. We also show that metric performance is data- and system-specific. Nevertheless, our results also suggest that automatic metrics perform reliably at system-level and can support system development by finding cases where a system performs poorly.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
OpeNLGauge: An Explainable Metric for NLG Evaluation with Open-Weights LLMs
Analyzing and Evaluating Correlation Measures in NLG Meta-Evaluation
Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability
Defining and Detecting Vulnerability in Human Evaluation Guidelines: A Preliminary Study Towards Reliable NLG Evaluation
Better than Random: Reliable NLG Human Evaluation with Constrained Active Sampling
Unveiling the Achilles' Heel of NLG Evaluators: A Unified Adversarial Framework Driven by Large Language Models
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.