Credible Review Detection with Limited Information using Consistency Analysis
원문 초록
Online reviews provide viewpoints on the strengths and shortcomings of products/services, influencing potential customers' purchasing decisions. However, the proliferation of non-credible reviews -- either fake (promoting/ demoting an item), incompetent (involving irrelevant aspects), or biased -- entails the problem of identifying credible reviews. Prior works involve classifiers harnessing rich information about items/users -- which might not be readily available in several domains -- that provide only limited interpretability as to why a review is deemed non-credible. This paper presents a novel approach to address the above issues. We utilize latent topic models leveraging review texts, item ratings, and timestamps to derive consistency features without relying on item/user histories, unavailable for "long-tail" items/users. We develop models, for computing review credibility scores to provide interpretable evidence for non-credible reviews, that are also transferable to other domains -- addressing the scarcity of labeled data. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Narrative Shift Detection: A Hybrid Approach of Dynamic Topic Models and Large Language Models
Constrained Non-negative Matrix Factorization for Guided Topic Modeling of Minority Topics
Evaluating Negative Sampling Approaches for Neural Topic Models
Seeded Poisson Factorization: Leveraging domain knowledge to fit topic models
Refining Dimensions for Improving Clustering-based Cross-lingual Topic Models
Locating the Leading Edge of Cultural Change
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.