Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
원문 초록
As machine learning systems become ubiquitous, there has been a surge of interest in interpretable machine learning: systems that provide explanation for their outputs. These explanations are often used to qualitatively assess other criteria such as safety or non-discrimination. However, despite the interest in interpretability, there is very little consensus on what interpretable machine learning is and how it should be measured. In this position paper, we first define interpretability and describe when interpretability is needed (and when it is not). Next, we suggest a taxonomy for rigorous evaluation and expose open questions towards a more rigorous science of interpretable machine learning.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework
Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees
SeqPE: Transformer with Sequential Position Encoding
We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems
midr: Learning from Black-Box Models by Maximum Interpretation Decomposition
JoFormer (Journey-based Transformer): Theory and Empirical Analysis on the Tiny Shakespeare Dataset
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.