How to evaluate word embeddings? On importance of data efficiency and simple supervised tasks
원문 초록
Maybe the single most important goal of representation learning is making subsequent learning faster. Surprisingly, this fact is not well reflected in the way embeddings are evaluated. In addition, recent practice in word embeddings points towards importance of learning specialized representations. We argue that focus of word representation evaluation should reflect those trends and shift towards evaluating what useful information is easily accessible. Specifically, we propose that evaluation should focus on data efficiency and simple supervised tasks, where the amount of available data is varied and scores of a supervised model are reported for each subset (as commonly done in transfer learning). In order to illustrate significance of such analysis, a comprehensive evaluation of selected word embeddings is presented. Proposed approach yields a more complete picture and brings new insight into performance characteristics, for instance information about word similarity or analogy tends to be non--linearly encoded in the embedding space, which questions the cosine-based, unsupervised, evaluation methods. All results and analysis scripts are available online.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
These are Not All the Features You are Looking For: A Fundamental Bottleneck In Supervised Pretraining
Multi-modal Siamese Network for Entity Alignment
RaMen: Multi-Strategy Multi-Modal Learning for Bundle Construction
Best Practices for Large-Scale, Pixel-Wise Crop Mapping and Transfer Learning Workflows
Robust-Multi-Task Gradient Boosting
Dual Dimensions Geometric Representation Learning Based Document Dewarping
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.