A Multifaceted Evaluation of Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation for 9 Language Directions
원문 초록
We aim to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of the newly introduced neural machine translation paradigm. To that end, we conduct a multifaceted evaluation in which we compare outputs produced by state-of-the-art neural machine translation and phrase-based machine translation systems for 9 language directions across a number of dimensions. Specifically, we measure the similarity of the outputs, their fluency and amount of reordering, the effect of sentence length and performance across different error categories. We find out that translations produced by neural machine translation systems are considerably different, more fluent and more accurate in terms of word order compared to those produced by phrase-based systems. Neural machine translation systems are also more accurate at producing inflected forms, but they perform poorly when translating very long sentences.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation
ConECT Dataset: Overcoming Data Scarcity in Context-Aware E-Commerce MT
Building a Functional Machine Translation Corpus for Kpelle
Combining the Best of Both Worlds: A Method for Hybrid NMT and LLM Translation
Same evaluation, more tokens: On the effect of input length for machine translation evaluation using Large Language Models
CycleDistill: Bootstrapping Machine Translation using LLMs with Cyclical Distillation
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.