Finding Better Active Learners for Faster Literature Reviews
원문 초록
Literature reviews can be time-consuming and tedious to complete. By cataloging and refactoring three state-of-the-art active learning techniques from evidence-based medicine and legal electronic discovery, this paper finds and implements FASTREAD, a faster technique for studying a large corpus of documents. This paper assesses FASTREAD using datasets generated from existing SE literature reviews (Hall, Wahono, Radjenovi\'c, Kitchenham et al.). Compared to manual methods, FASTREAD lets researchers find 95% relevant studies after reviewing an order of magnitude fewer papers. Compared to other state-of-the-art automatic methods, FASTREAD reviews 20-50% fewer studies while finding same number of relevant primary studies in a systematic literature review.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Near-Polynomially Competitive Active Logistic Regression
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression
The Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning
Info-Coevolution: An Efficient Framework for Data Model Coevolution
ALINE: Joint Amortization for Bayesian Inference and Active Data Acquisition
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.