Self-Modification of Policy and Utility Function in Rational Agents
원문 초록
Any agent that is part of the environment it interacts with and has versatile actuators (such as arms and fingers), will in principle have the ability to self-modify -- for example by changing its own source code. As we continue to create more and more intelligent agents, chances increase that they will learn about this ability. The question is: will they want to use it? For example, highly intelligent systems may find ways to change their goals to something more easily achievable, thereby `escaping' the control of their designers. In an important paper, Omohundro (2008) argued that goal preservation is a fundamental drive of any intelligent system, since a goal is more likely to be achieved if future versions of the agent strive towards the same goal. In this paper, we formalise this argument in general reinforcement learning, and explore situations where it fails. Our conclusion is that the self-modification possibility is harmless if and only if the value function of the agent anticipates the consequences of self-modifications and use the current utility function when evaluating the future.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
NOVER: Incentive Training for Language Models via Verifier-Free Reinforcement Learning
PeRL: Permutation-Enhanced Reinforcement Learning for Interleaved Vision-Language Reasoning
D3PG: Dirichlet DDPG for Task Partitioning and Offloading With Constrained Hybrid Action Space in Mobile-Edge Computing
A State Representation Dueling Network for Deep Reinforcement Learning
Refining Few-Step Text-to-Multiview Diffusion via Reinforcement Learning
Fully Offline Reinforcement Learning
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.