The Kernel Two-Sample Test for Brain Networks
원문 초록
In clinical and neuroscientific studies, systematic differences between two populations of brain networks are investigated in order to characterize mental diseases or processes. Those networks are usually represented as graphs built from neuroimaging data and studied by means of graph analysis methods. The typical machine learning approach to study these brain graphs creates a classifier and tests its ability to discriminate the two populations. In contrast to this approach, in this work we propose to directly test whether two populations of graphs are different or not, by using the kernel two-sample test (KTST), without creating the intermediate classifier. We claim that, in general, the two approaches provides similar results and that the KTST requires much less computation. Additionally, in the regime of low sample size, we claim that the KTST has lower frequency of Type II error than the classification approach. Besides providing algorithmic considerations to support these claims, we show strong evidence through experiments and one simulation.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Quantile-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning using Two-Timescale Policy Gradient Algorithms
Leveraging the two timescale regime to demonstrate convergence of neural networks
Training a Two Layer ReLU Network Analytically
MiniRBT: A Two-stage Distilled Small Chinese Pre-trained Model
FinalMLP: An Enhanced Two-Stream MLP Model for CTR Prediction
Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systems
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.