Analysis of Crowdsourced Sampling Strategies for HodgeRank with Sparse Random Graphs
원문 초록
Crowdsourcing platforms are now extensively used for conducting subjective pairwise comparison studies. In this setting, a pairwise comparison dataset is typically gathered via random sampling, either \emph{with} or \emph{without} replacement. In this paper, we use tools from random graph theory to analyze these two random sampling methods for the HodgeRank estimator. Using the Fiedler value of the graph as a measurement for estimator stability (informativeness), we provide a new estimate of the Fiedler value for these two random graph models. In the asymptotic limit as the number of vertices tends to infinity, we prove the validity of the estimate. Based on our findings, for a small number of items to be compared, we recommend a two-stage sampling strategy where a greedy sampling method is used initially and random sampling \emph{without} replacement is used in the second stage. When a large number of items is to be compared, we recommend random sampling with replacement as this is computationally inexpensive and trivially parallelizable. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets support our analysis.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Multi-Preference Lambda-weighted Listwise DPO for Dynamic Preference Alignment
CuRe: Cultural Gaps in the Long Tail of Text-to-Image Systems
ERU-KG: Efficient Reference-aligned Unsupervised Keyphrase Generation
Power-Law Decay Loss for Large Language Model Finetuning: Focusing on Information Sparsity to Enhance Generation Quality
ICYM2I: The illusion of multimodal informativeness under missingness
Laplace Sample Information: Data Informativeness Through a Bayesian Lens
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.