When is the majority-vote classifier beneficial?
원문 초록
In his seminal work, Schapire (1990) proved that weak classifiers could be improved to achieve arbitrarily high accuracy, but he never implied that a simple majority-vote mechanism could always do the trick. By comparing the asymptotic misclassification error of the majority-vote classifier with the average individual error, we discover an interesting phase-transition phenomenon. For binary classification with equal prior probabilities, our result implies that, for the majority-vote mechanism to work, the collection of weak classifiers must meet the minimum requirement of having an average true positive rate of at least 50% and an average false positive rate of at most 50%.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
LLSF - Learning Label Specific Features for Multi-Label Classifcation
Inverse Scene Text Removal
EDINET-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Complex Financial Tasks using Japanese Financial Statements
PatchDEMUX: A Certifiably Robust Framework for Multi-label Classifiers Against Adversarial Patches
LGAR: Zero-Shot LLM-Guided Neural Ranking for Abstract Screening in Systematic Literature Reviews
Rhapsody: A Dataset for Highlight Detection in Podcasts
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.