Evaluation of Performance Measures for Classifiers Comparison
원문 초록
The selection of the best classification algorithm for a given dataset is a very widespread problem, occuring each time one has to choose a classifier to solve a real-world problem. It is also a complex task with many important methodological decisions to make. Among those, one of the most crucial is the choice of an appropriate measure in order to properly assess the classification performance and rank the algorithms. In this article, we focus on this specific task. We present the most popular measures and compare their behavior through discrimination plots. We then discuss their properties from a more theoretical perspective. It turns out several of them are equivalent for classifiers comparison purposes. Futhermore. they can also lead to interpretation problems. Among the numerous measures proposed over the years, it appears that the classical overall success rate and marginal rates are the more suitable for classifier comparison task.
함께 살펴볼 논문
공통 태그를 근거로 연결했습니다. 실제 인용 관계나 논문의 우수성을 뜻하지 않습니다.
Using Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models to Identify Indicators of Vulnerability in Police Incident Narratives
Harmonic-NAS: Hardware-Aware Multimodal Neural Architecture Search on Resource-constrained Devices
STRAPPER: Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Self-training Augmentation and Peer Regularization
Unlocking the Use of Raw Multispectral Earth Observation Imagery for Onboard Artificial Intelligence
VNE: An Effective Method for Improving Deep Representation by Manipulating Eigenvalue Distribution
Continuous Indeterminate Probability Neural Network
토론
이 논문과 연결된 포럼 글이 아직 없습니다.