In the rapidly evolving landscape of social media, the introduction of new emojis in Unicode release versions presents a structured opportunity to explore digital language evolution. Analyzing a large dataset of sampled English tweets, we examine how newly released emojis gain traction and evolve in meaning. We find that community size of early adopters and emoji semantics are crucial in determining their popularity. Certain emojis experienced notable shifts in the meanings and sentiment associations during the diffusion process. Additionally, we propose a novel framework utilizing language models to extract words and pre-existing emojis with semantically similar contexts, which enhances interpretation of new emojis. The framework demonstrates its effectiveness in improving sentiment classification performance by substituting unknown new emojis with familiar ones. This study offers a new perspective in understanding how new language units are adopted, adapted, and integrated into the fabric of online communication.
Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is a fine-grained linguistics problem that entails the extraction of multifaceted aspects, opinions, and sentiments from the given text. Both standalone and compound ABSA tasks have been extensively used in the literature to examine the nuanced information present in online reviews and social media posts. Current ABSA methods often rely on static hyperparameters for attention-masking mechanisms, which can struggle with context adaptation and may overlook the unique relevance of words in varied situations. This leads to challenges in accurately analyzing complex sentences containing multiple aspects with differing sentiments. In this work, we present adaptive masking methods that remove irrelevant tokens based on context to assist in Aspect Term Extraction and Aspect Sentiment Classification subtasks of ABSA. We show with our experiments that the proposed methods outperform the baseline methods in terms of accuracy and F1 scores on four benchmark online review datasets. Further, we show that the proposed methods can be extended with multiple adaptations and demonstrate a qualitative analysis of the proposed approach using sample text for aspect term extraction.
The ability to generate sentiment-controlled feedback in response to multimodal inputs comprising text and images addresses a critical gap in human-computer interaction. This capability allows systems to provide empathetic, accurate, and engaging responses, with useful applications in education, healthcare, marketing, and customer service. To this end, we have constructed a large-scale Controllable Multimodal Feedback Synthesis (CMFeed) dataset and propose a controllable feedback synthesis system. The system features an encoder, decoder, and controllability block for textual and visual inputs. It extracts features using a transformer and Faster R-CNN networks, combining them to generate feedback. The CMFeed dataset includes images, texts, reactions to the posts, human comments with relevance scores, and reactions to these comments. These reactions train the model to produce feedback with specified sentiments, achieving a sentiment classification accuracy of 77.23\%, which is 18.82\% higher than the accuracy without controllability. The system also incorporates a similarity module for assessing feedback relevance through rank-based metrics and an interpretability technique to analyze the contributions of textual and visual features during feedback generation. Access to the CMFeed dataset and the system's code is available at https://github.com/MIntelligence-Group/CMFeed.
Recent work has shown the defense of 01 loss sign activation neural networks against image classification adversarial attacks. A public challenge to attack the models on CIFAR10 dataset remains undefeated. We ask the following question in this study: are 01 loss sign activation neural networks hard to deceive with a popular black box text adversarial attack program called TextFooler? We study this question on four popular text classification datasets: IMDB reviews, Yelp reviews, MR sentiment classification, and AG news classification. We find that our 01 loss sign activation network is much harder to attack with TextFooler compared to sigmoid activation cross entropy and binary neural networks. We also study a 01 loss sign activation convolutional neural network with a novel global pooling step specific to sign activation networks. With this new variation we see a significant gain in adversarial accuracy rendering TextFooler practically useless against it. We make our code freely available at \url{https://github.com/zero-one-loss/wordcnn01} and \url{https://github.com/xyzacademic/mlp01example}. Our work here suggests that 01 loss sign activation networks could be further developed to create fool proof models against text adversarial attacks.
Despite significant investment into safety training, large language models (LLMs) deployed in the real world still suffer from numerous vulnerabilities. One perspective on LLM safety training is that it algorithmically forbids the model from answering toxic or harmful queries. To assess the effectiveness of safety training, in this work, we study forbidden tasks, i.e., tasks the model is designed to refuse to answer. Specifically, we investigate whether in-context learning (ICL) can be used to re-learn forbidden tasks despite the explicit fine-tuning of the model to refuse them. We first examine a toy example of refusing sentiment classification to demonstrate the problem. Then, we use ICL on a model fine-tuned to refuse to summarise made-up news articles. Finally, we investigate whether ICL can undo safety training, which could represent a major security risk. For the safety task, we look at Vicuna-7B, Starling-7B, and Llama2-7B. We show that the attack works out-of-the-box on Starling-7B and Vicuna-7B but fails on Llama2-7B. Finally, we propose an ICL attack that uses the chat template tokens like a prompt injection attack to achieve a better attack success rate on Vicuna-7B and Starling-7B. Trigger Warning: the appendix contains LLM-generated text with violence, suicide, and misinformation.
One of the challenges of natural language understanding is to deal with the subjectivity of sentences, which may express opinions and emotions that add layers of complexity and nuance. Sentiment analysis is a field that aims to extract and analyze these subjective elements from text, and it can be applied at different levels of granularity, such as document, paragraph, sentence, or aspect. Aspect-based sentiment analysis is a well-studied topic with many available data sets and models. However, there is no clear definition of what makes a sentence difficult for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In this paper, we explore this question by conducting an experiment with three data sets: "Laptops", "Restaurants", and "MTSC" (Multi-Target-dependent Sentiment Classification), and a merged version of these three datasets. We study the impact of domain diversity and syntactic diversity on difficulty. We use a combination of classifiers to identify the most difficult sentences and analyze their characteristics. We employ two ways of defining sentence difficulty. The first one is binary and labels a sentence as difficult if the classifiers fail to correctly predict the sentiment polarity. The second one is a six-level scale based on how many of the top five best-performing classifiers can correctly predict the sentiment polarity. We also define 9 linguistic features that, combined, aim at estimating the difficulty at sentence level.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across a wide variety of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks and have attracted attention from multiple domains, including financial services. Despite the extensive research into general-domain LLMs, and their immense potential in finance, Financial LLM (FinLLM) research remains limited. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of FinLLMs, including their history, techniques, performance, and opportunities and challenges. Firstly, we present a chronological overview of general-domain Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) through to current FinLLMs, including the GPT-series, selected open-source LLMs, and financial LMs. Secondly, we compare five techniques used across financial PLMs and FinLLMs, including training methods, training data, and fine-tuning methods. Thirdly, we summarize the performance evaluations of six benchmark tasks and datasets. In addition, we provide eight advanced financial NLP tasks and datasets for developing more sophisticated FinLLMs. Finally, we discuss the opportunities and the challenges facing FinLLMs, such as hallucination, privacy, and efficiency. To support AI research in finance, we compile a collection of accessible datasets and evaluation benchmarks on GitHub.
Understanding the importance of the inputs on the output is useful across many tasks. This work provides an information-theoretic framework to analyse the influence of inputs for text classification tasks. Natural language processing (NLP) tasks take either a single element input or multiple element inputs to predict an output variable, where an element is a block of text. Each text element has two components: an associated semantic meaning and a linguistic realization. Multiple-choice reading comprehension (MCRC) and sentiment classification (SC) are selected to showcase the framework. For MCRC, it is found that the context influence on the output compared to the question influence reduces on more challenging datasets. In particular, more challenging contexts allow a greater variation in complexity of questions. Hence, test creators need to carefully consider the choice of the context when designing multiple-choice questions for assessment. For SC, it is found the semantic meaning of the input text dominates (above 80\% for all datasets considered) compared to its linguistic realisation when determining the sentiment. The framework is made available at: https://github.com/WangLuran/nlp-element-influence
Fine-tuning large pre-trained language models (LLMs) on particular datasets is a commonly employed strategy in Natural Language Processing (NLP) classification tasks. However, this approach usually results in a loss of models generalizability. In this paper, we present a framework that allows for maintaining generalizability, and enhances the performance on the downstream task by utilizing task-specific context attribution. We show that a linear transformation of the text representation from any transformer model using the task-specific concept operator results in a projection onto the latent concept space, referred to as context attribution in this paper. The specific concept operator is optimized during the supervised learning stage via novel loss functions. The proposed framework demonstrates that context attribution of the text representation for each task objective can improve the capacity of the discriminator function and thus achieve better performance for the classification task. Experimental results on three datasets, namely HateXplain, IMDB reviews, and Social Media Attributions, illustrate that the proposed model attains superior accuracy and generalizability. Specifically, for the non-fine-tuned BERT on the HateXplain dataset, we observe 8% improvement in accuracy and 10% improvement in F1-score. Whereas for the IMDB dataset, fine-tuned state-of-the-art XLNet is outperformed by 1% for both accuracy and F1-score. Furthermore, in an out-of-domain cross-dataset test, DistilBERT fine-tuned on the IMDB dataset in conjunction with the proposed model improves the F1-score on the HateXplain dataset by 7%. For the Social Media Attributions dataset of YouTube comments, we observe 5.2% increase in F1-metric. The proposed framework is implemented with PyTorch and provided open-source on GitHub.
Analyzing authors' sentiments in texts as a technique for identifying text polarity can be practical and useful in various fields, including medicine and dentistry. Currently, due to factors such as patients' limited knowledge about their condition, difficulties in accessing specialist doctors, or fear of illness, particularly in pandemic conditions, there might be a delay between receiving a radiology report and consulting a doctor. In some cases, this delay can pose significant risks to the patient, making timely decision-making crucial. Having an automatic system that can inform patients about the deterioration of their condition by analyzing the text of radiology reports could greatly impact timely decision-making. In this study, a dataset comprising 1,134 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) photo reports was collected from the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Each case was examined, and an expert labeled a severity level for the patient's condition on each document. After preprocessing all the text data, a deep learning model based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network architecture, known as CNN-LSTM, was developed to detect the severity level of the patient's problem based on sentiment analysis in the radiologist's report. The model's performance was evaluated on two datasets, each with two and four classes, in both imbalanced and balanced scenarios. Finally, to demonstrate the effectiveness of our model, we compared its performance with that of other classification models. The results, along with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test, indicated that our proposed model (CNN-LSTM) performed the best according to precision, recall, and f-measure criteria. This suggests that it can be a reliable model for estimating the severity of oral and dental diseases, thereby assisting patients.
We report results of a longitudinal sentiment classification of Reddit posts written by students of four major Canadian universities. We work with the texts of the posts, concentrating on the years 2020-2023. By finely tuning a sentiment threshold to a range of [-0.075,0.075], we successfully built classifiers proficient in categorizing post sentiments into positive and negative categories. Noticeably, our sentiment classification results are consistent across the four university data sets.
Instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks and will even explain their reasoning, so-called self-explanations. However, convincing and wrong self-explanations can lead to unsupported confidence in LLMs, thus increasing risk. Therefore, it's important to measure if self-explanations truly reflect the model's behavior. Such a measure is called interpretability-faithfulness and is challenging to perform since the ground truth is inaccessible, and many LLMs only have an inference API. To address this, we propose employing self-consistency checks to measure faithfulness. For example, if an LLM says a set of words is important for making a prediction, then it should not be able to make its prediction without these words. While self-consistency checks are a common approach to faithfulness, they have not previously been successfully applied to LLM self-explanations for counterfactual, feature attribution, and redaction explanations. Our results demonstrate that faithfulness is explanation, model, and task-dependent, showing self-explanations should not be trusted in general. For example, with sentiment classification, counterfactuals are more faithful for Llama2, feature attribution for Mistral, and redaction for Falcon 40B.
Recently, Deep Learning (DL) approaches have been applied to solve the Sentiment Classification (SC) problem, which is a core task in reviews mining or Sentiment Analysis (SA). The performances of these approaches are affected by different factors. This paper addresses these factors and classifies them into three categories: data preparation based factors, feature representation based factors and the classification techniques based factors. The paper is a comprehensive literature-based survey that compares the performance of more than 100 DL-based SC approaches by using 21 public datasets of reviews given by customers within three specific application domains (products, movies and restaurants). These 21 datasets have different characteristics (balanced/imbalanced, size, etc.) to give a global vision for our study. The comparison explains how the proposed factors quantitatively affect the performance of the studied DL-based SC approaches.
The surge of e-commerce reviews has presented a challenge in manually annotating the vast volume of reviews to comprehend their underlying aspects and sentiments. This research focused on leveraging weakly supervised learning to tackle aspect category learning and the sentiment classification of reviews. Our approach involves the generation of labels for both aspects and sentiments, employing the Snorkel framework of WSL, which incorporates aspect terms, review sentiment scores, and review ratings as sources of weak signals. This innovative strategy significantly reduces the laborious labeling efforts required for processing such extensive datasets. In this study, we deployed hybrid models, namely BiLSTM, CNN-BiLSTM, and CNN-LSTM, which harness multiple inputs, including review text, aspect terms, and ratings. Our proposed model employs two distinct loss functions: Binary Cross Entropy with Sigmoid Activation for Multi-Label Classification, enabling us to learn aspect Labels such as Quality, Usability, Service, Size, and Price, and Categorical Cross Entropy with Softmax Activations for Multi-Class Classification. Subsequently, we meticulously evaluate the performance metrics of these three implemented models, including Macro F1 score and Macro Precision. CNN & Bi-LSTM model attained 0.78 and 0.79 F1 scores on aspect and sentiment identification, respectively. The outcomes of this research are poised to make a substantial contribution to e-commerce platforms, offering an efficient and automated means to label and analyze vast troves of user reviews.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated superior abilities in tasks such as chatting, reasoning, and question-answering. However, standard LLMs may ignore crucial paralinguistic information, such as sentiment, emotion, and speaking style, which are essential for achieving natural, human-like spoken conversation, especially when such information is conveyed by acoustic cues. We therefore propose Paralinguistics-enhanced Generative Pretrained Transformer (ParalinGPT), an LLM that utilizes text and speech modalities to better model the linguistic content and paralinguistic attributes of spoken dialogue. The model takes the conversational context of text, speech embeddings, and paralinguistic attributes as input prompts within a serialized multitasking multimodal framework. Specifically, our framework serializes tasks in the order of current paralinguistic attribute prediction, response paralinguistic attribute prediction, and response text generation with autoregressive conditioning. We utilize the Switchboard-1 corpus, including its sentiment labels as the paralinguistic attribute, as our spoken dialogue dataset. Experimental results indicate the proposed serialized multitasking method outperforms typical sequence classification techniques on current and response sentiment classification. Furthermore, leveraging conversational context and speech embeddings significantly improves both response text generation and sentiment prediction. Our proposed framework achieves relative improvements of 6.7%, 12.0%, and 3.5% in current sentiment accuracy, response sentiment accuracy, and response text BLEU score, respectively.
Existing PTLM-based models for TSC can be categorized into two groups: 1) fine-tuning-based models that adopt PTLM as the context encoder; 2) prompting-based models that transfer the classification task to the text/word generation task. In this paper, we present a new perspective of leveraging PTLM for TSC: simultaneously leveraging the merits of both language modeling and explicit target-context interactions via contextual target attributes. Specifically, we design the domain- and target-constrained cloze test, which can leverage the PTLMs' strong language modeling ability to generate the given target's attributes pertaining to the review context. The attributes contain the background and property information of the target, which can help to enrich the semantics of the review context and the target. To exploit the attributes for tackling TSC, we first construct a heterogeneous information graph by treating the attributes as nodes and combining them with (1) the syntax graph automatically produced by the off-the-shelf dependency parser and (2) the semantics graph of the review context, which is derived from the self-attention mechanism. Then we propose a heterogeneous information gated graph convolutional network to model the interactions among the attribute information, the syntactic information, and the contextual information. The experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of our model, which achieves new state-of-the-art performance.
Sentiment analysis methods are rapidly being adopted by the field of Urban Design and Planning, for the crowdsourced evaluation of urban environments. However, most models used within this domain are able to identify positive or negative sentiment associated with a textual appraisal as a whole, without inferring information about specific urban aspects contained within it, or the sentiment associated with them. While Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) is becoming increasingly popular, most existing ABSA models are trained on non-urban themes such as restaurants, electronics, consumer goods and the like. This body of research develops an ABSA model capable of extracting urban aspects contained within geo-located textual urban appraisals, along with corresponding aspect sentiment classification. We annotate a dataset of 2500 crowdsourced reviews of public parks, and train a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model with Local Context Focus (LCF) on this data. Our model achieves significant improvement in prediction accuracy on urban reviews, for both Aspect Term Extraction (ATE) and Aspect Sentiment Classification (ASC) tasks. For demonstrative analysis, positive and negative urban aspects across Boston are spatially visualized. We hope that this model is useful for designers and planners for fine-grained urban sentiment evaluation.
Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA), a fine-grained sentiment classification task, has received much attention recently. Many works investigate sentiment information through opinion words, such as ''good'' and ''bad''. However, implicit sentiment widely exists in the ABSA dataset, which refers to the sentence containing no distinct opinion words but still expresses sentiment to the aspect term. To deal with implicit sentiment, this paper proposes an ABSA method that integrates explicit sentiment augmentations. And we propose an ABSA-specific augmentation method to create such augmentations. Specifically, we post-trains T5 by rule-based data. We employ Syntax Distance Weighting and Unlikelihood Contrastive Regularization in the training procedure to guide the model to generate an explicit sentiment. Meanwhile, we utilize the Constrained Beam Search to ensure the augmentation sentence contains the aspect terms. We test ABSA-ESA on two of the most popular benchmarks of ABSA. The results show that ABSA-ESA outperforms the SOTA baselines on implicit and explicit sentiment accuracy.
In this paper, we propose a novel method to enhance sentiment analysis by addressing the challenge of context-specific word meanings. It combines the advantages of a BERT model with a knowledge graph based synonym data. This synergy leverages a dynamic attention mechanism to develop a knowledge-driven state vector. For classifying sentiments linked to specific aspects, the approach constructs a memory bank integrating positional data. The data are then analyzed using a DCGRU to pinpoint sentiment characteristics related to specific aspect terms. Experiments on three widely used datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method in sentiment classification.
Few-shot text classification has attracted great interest in both academia and industry due to the lack of labeled data in many fields. Different from general text classification (e.g., topic classification), few-shot sentiment classification is more challenging because the semantic distances among the classes are more subtle. For instance, the semantic distances between the sentiment labels in a positive or negative polarity (e.g., ``love" and ``joy", ``remorse" and ``sadness") are close, while the distances are large for the sentiment labels in two opposite polarities (e.g., ``love" and ``sadness"). To address this problem, we propose a Soft Contrastive learning-based Prompt (\texttt{SCP}) model for few-shot sentiment analysis. First, we design a sentiment-aware chain of thought prompt module to guide the model to predict the sentiment from coarse grain to fine grain via a series of intermediate reasoning steps. Then, we propose a soft contrastive learning algorithm to take the correlation of the labels into account. A series of experiments on several sentiment analysis datasets show the great advantages of \texttt{SCP} by comparing it with SOTA baselines (e.g., ChatGPT).