Mobile-edge computing (MEC) has been regarded as a promising paradigm to reduce service latency for data processing in the Internet of Things (IoT) by provisioning computing resources at the network edges. In this work, we jointly optimize the task partitioning and computational power allocation for computation offloading in a dynamic environment with multiple IoT devices and multiple edge servers. We formulate the problem as a Markov decision process with constrained hybrid action space, which cannot be well handled by existing deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms. Therefore, we develop a novel DRL called Dirichlet deep deterministic policy gradient (D3PG), which is built on deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) to solve the problem. The developed model can learn to solve multiobjective optimization, including maximizing the number of tasks processed before deadlines and minimizing the energy cost and service latency. More importantly, D3PG can effectively deal with a constrained distribution-continuous hybrid action spaces, where the distribution variables are for the task partitioning and offloading, while the continuous variables are for computational frequency control. Moreover, the D3PG can address many similar issues in MEC and general reinforcement learning problems. Extensive simulation results show that the proposed D3PG outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
Improving the fairness of machine learning models is a nuanced task that requires decision makers to reason about multiple, conflicting criteria. The majority of fair machine learning methods transform the error-fairness trade-off into a single objective problem with a parameter controlling the relative importance of error versus fairness. We propose instead to directly optimize the error-fairness tradeoff by using multi-objective optimization. We present a flexible framework for defining the fair machine learning task as a weighted classification problem with multiple cost functions. This framework is agnostic to the underlying prediction model as well as the metrics. We use multiobjective optimization to define the sample weights used in model training for a given machine learner, and adapt the weights to optimize multiple metrics of fairness and accuracy across a set of tasks. To reduce the number of optimized parameters, and to constrain their complexity with respect to population subgroups, we propose a novel meta-model approach that learns to map protected attributes to sample weights, rather than optimizing those weights directly. On a set of real-world problems, this approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods by finding solution sets with preferable error/fairness trade-offs.
In order to deploy machine learning in a real-world self-driving laboratory where data acquisition is costly and there are multiple competing design criteria, systems need to be able to intelligently sample while balancing performance trade-offs and constraints. For these reasons, we present an active learning process based on multiobjective black-box optimization with continuously updated machine learning models. This workflow is built on open-source technologies for real-time data streaming and modular multiobjective optimization software development. We demonstrate a proof of concept for this workflow through the autonomous operation of a continuous-flow chemistry laboratory, which identifies ideal manufacturing conditions for the electrolyte 2,2,2-trifluoroethyl methyl carbonate.
The large-scale multiobjective optimization problem (LSMOP) is characterized by simultaneously optimizing multiple conflicting objectives and involving hundreds of decision variables. Many real-world applications in engineering fields can be modeled as LSMOPs; simultaneously, engineering applications require insensitivity in performance. This requirement usually means that the results from the algorithm runs should not only be good for every run in terms of performance but also that the performance of multiple runs should not fluctuate too much, i.e., the algorithm shows good insensitivity. Considering that substantial computational resources are requested for each run, it is essential to improve upon the performance of the large-scale multiobjective optimization algorithm, as well as the insensitivity of the algorithm. However, existing large-scale multiobjective optimization algorithms solely focus on improving the performance of the algorithms, leaving the insensitivity characteristics unattended. In this work, we propose an evolutionary algorithm for solving LSMOPs based on Monte Carlo tree search, the so-called LMMOCTS, which aims to improve the performance and insensitivity for large-scale multiobjective optimization problems. The proposed method samples the decision variables to construct new nodes on the Monte Carlo tree for optimization and evaluation. It selects nodes with good evaluation for further search to reduce the performance sensitivity caused by large-scale decision variables. We compare the proposed algorithm with several state-of-the-art designs on different benchmark functions. We also propose two metrics to measure the sensitivity of the algorithm. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness and performance insensitivity of the proposed design for solving large-scale multiobjective optimization problems.
We define very large-scale multiobjective optimization problems as optimizing multiple objectives (VLSMOPs) with more than 100,000 decision variables. These problems hold substantial significance, given the ubiquity of real-world scenarios necessitating the optimization of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of variables. However, the larger dimension in VLSMOPs intensifies the curse of dimensionality and poses significant challenges for existing large-scale evolutionary multiobjective algorithms, rendering them more difficult to solve within the constraints of practical computing resources. To overcome this issue, we propose a novel approach called the very large-scale multiobjective optimization framework (VMOF). The method efficiently samples general yet suitable evolutionary directions in the very large-scale space and subsequently fine-tunes these directions to locate the Pareto-optimal solutions. To sample the most suitable evolutionary directions for different solutions, Thompson sampling is adopted for its effectiveness in recommending from a very large number of items within limited historical evaluations. Furthermore, a technique is designed for fine-tuning directions specific to tracking Pareto-optimal solutions. To understand the designed framework, we present our analysis of the framework and then evaluate VMOF using widely recognized benchmarks and real-world problems spanning dimensions from 100 to 1,000,000. Experimental results demonstrate that our method exhibits superior performance not only on LSMOPs but also on VLSMOPs when compared to existing algorithms.
Constrained multiobjective optimization has gained much interest in the past few years. However, constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs) are still unsatisfactorily understood. Consequently, the choice of adequate CMOPs for benchmarking is difficult and lacks a formal background. This paper addresses this issue by exploring CMOPs from a performance space perspective. First, it presents a novel performance assessment approach designed explicitly for constrained multiobjective optimization. This methodology offers a first attempt to simultaneously measure the performance in approximating the Pareto front and constraint satisfaction. Secondly, it proposes an approach to measure the capability of the given optimization problem to differentiate among algorithm performances. Finally, this approach is used to contrast eight frequently used artificial test suites of CMOPs. The experimental results reveal which suites are more efficient in discerning between three well-known multiobjective optimization algorithms. Benchmark designers can use these results to select the most appropriate CMOPs for their needs.
The goal of constrained multiobjective evolutionary optimization is to obtain a set of well-converged and welldistributed feasible solutions. To complete this goal, there should be a tradeoff among feasibility, diversity, and convergence. However, it is nontrivial to balance these three elements simultaneously by using a single tradeoff model since the importance of each element varies in different evolutionary phases. As an alternative, we adapt different tradeoff models in different phases and propose a novel algorithm called ATM-R. In the infeasible phase, ATM-R takes the tradeoff between diversity and feasibility into account, aiming to move the population toward feasible regions from diverse search directions. In the semi-feasible phase, ATM-R promotes the transition from "the tradeoff between feasibility and diversity" to "the tradeoff between diversity and convergence", which can facilitate the discovering of enough feasible regions and speed up the search for the feasible Pareto optima in succession. In the feasible phase, the tradeoff between diversity and convergence is considered to attain a set of well-converged and well-distributed feasible solutions. It is worth noting that the merits of reference points are leveraged in ATM-R to accomplish these tradeoff models. Also, in ATM-R, a multiphase mating selection strategy is developed to generate promising solutions beneficial to different evolutionary phases. Systemic experiments on a wide range of benchmark test functions demonstrate that ATM-R is effective and competitive, compared against five state-of-the-art constrained multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithms.
A hybrid framework combining the branch and bound method with multiobjective evolutionary algorithms is proposed for nonconvex multiobjective optimization. The hybridization exploits the complementary character of the two optimization strategies. A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm is intended for inducing tight lower and upper bounds during the branch and bound procedure. Tight bounds such as the ones derived in this way can reduce the number of subproblems that have to be solved. The branch and bound method guarantees the global convergence of the framework and improves the search capability of the multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. An implementation of the hybrid framework considering NSGA-II and MOEA/D-DE as multiobjective evolutionary algorithms is presented. Numerical experiments verify the hybrid algorithms benefit from synergy of the branch and bound method and multiobjective evolutionary algorithms.
The problem of approximating the Pareto front of a multiobjective optimization problem can be reformulated as the problem of finding a set that maximizes the hypervolume indicator. This paper establishes the analytical expression of the Hessian matrix of the mapping from a (fixed size) collection of $n$ points in the $d$-dimensional decision space (or $m$ dimensional objective space) to the scalar hypervolume indicator value. To define the Hessian matrix, the input set is vectorized, and the matrix is derived by analytical differentiation of the mapping from a vectorized set to the hypervolume indicator. The Hessian matrix plays a crucial role in second-order methods, such as the Newton-Raphson optimization method, and it can be used for the verification of local optimal sets. So far, the full analytical expression was only established and analyzed for the relatively simple bi-objective case. This paper will derive the full expression for arbitrary dimensions ($m\geq2$ objective functions). For the practically important three-dimensional case, we also provide an asymptotically efficient algorithm with time complexity in $O(n\log n)$ for the exact computation of the Hessian Matrix' non-zero entries. We establish a sharp bound of $12m-6$ for the number of non-zero entries. Also, for the general $m$-dimensional case, a compact recursive analytical expression is established, and its algorithmic implementation is discussed. Also, for the general case, some sparsity results can be established; these results are implied by the recursive expression. To validate and illustrate the analytically derived algorithms and results, we provide a few numerical examples using Python and Mathematica implementations. Open-source implementations of the algorithms and testing data are made available as a supplement to this paper.
Scientific machine learning (SciML) is a field of increasing interest in several different application fields. In an optimization context, SciML-based tools have enabled the development of more efficient optimization methods. However, implementing SciML tools for optimization must be rigorously evaluated and performed with caution. This work proposes the deductions of a robustness test that guarantees the robustness of multiobjective SciML-based optimization by showing that its results respect the universal approximator theorem. The test is applied in the framework of a novel methodology which is evaluated in a series of benchmarks illustrating its consistency. Moreover, the proposed methodology results are compared with feasible regions of rigorous optimization, which requires a significantly higher computational effort. Hence, this work provides a robustness test for guaranteed robustness in applying SciML tools in multiobjective optimization with lower computational effort than the existent alternative.
The ongoing advancements in network architecture design have led to remarkable achievements in deep learning across various challenging computer vision tasks. Meanwhile, the development of neural architecture search (NAS) has provided promising approaches to automating the design of network architectures for lower prediction error. Recently, the emerging application scenarios of deep learning have raised higher demands for network architectures considering multiple design criteria: number of parameters/floating-point operations, and inference latency, among others. From an optimization point of view, the NAS tasks involving multiple design criteria are intrinsically multiobjective optimization problems; hence, it is reasonable to adopt evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithms for tackling them. Nonetheless, there is still a clear gap confining the related research along this pathway: on the one hand, there is a lack of a general problem formulation of NAS tasks from an optimization point of view; on the other hand, there are challenges in conducting benchmark assessments of EMO algorithms on NAS tasks. To bridge the gap: (i) we formulate NAS tasks into general multi-objective optimization problems and analyze the complex characteristics from an optimization point of view; (ii) we present an end-to-end pipeline, dubbed $\texttt{EvoXBench}$, to generate benchmark test problems for EMO algorithms to run efficiently -- without the requirement of GPUs or Pytorch/Tensorflow; (iii) we instantiate two test suites comprehensively covering two datasets, seven search spaces, and three hardware devices, involving up to eight objectives. Based on the above, we validate the proposed test suites using six representative EMO algorithms and provide some empirical analyses. The code of $\texttt{EvoXBench}$ is available from $\href{https://github.com/EMI-Group/EvoXBench}{\rm{here}}$.
A novel neural network (NN) approach is proposed for constrained optimization. The proposed method uses a specially designed NN architecture and training/optimization procedure called Neural Optimization Machine (NOM). The objective functions for the NOM are approximated with NN models. The optimization process is conducted by the neural network's built-in backpropagation algorithm. The NOM solves optimization problems by extending the architecture of the NN objective function model. This is achieved by appropriately designing the NOM's structure, activation function, and loss function. The NN objective function can have arbitrary architectures and activation functions. The application of the NOM is not limited to specific optimization problems, e.g., linear and quadratic programming. It is shown that the increase of dimension of design variables does not increase the computational cost significantly. Then, the NOM is extended for multiobjective optimization. Finally, the NOM is tested using numerical optimization problems and applied for the optimal design of processing parameters in additive manufacturing.
In the field of evolutionary multiobjective optimization, the decision maker (DM) concerns conflicting objectives. In the real-world applications, there usually exist more than one DM and each DM concerns parts of these objectives. Multiparty multiobjective optimization problems (MPMOPs) are proposed to depict the MOP with multiple decision makers involved, where each party concerns about certain some objectives of all. However, in the evolutionary computation field, there is not much attention paid on MPMOPs. This paper constructs a series of MPMOPs based on distance minimization problems (DMPs), whose Pareto optimal solutions can be vividly visualized. To address MPMOPs, the new proposed algorithm OptMPNDS3 uses the multiparty initializing method to initialize the population and takes JADE2 operator to generate the offsprings. OptMPNDS3 is compared with OptAll, OptMPNDS and OptMPNDS2 on the problem suite. The result shows that OptMPNDS3 is strongly comparable to other algorithms
Recent years have seen the rapid development of fairness-aware machine learning in mitigating unfairness or discrimination in decision-making in a wide range of applications. However, much less attention has been paid to the fairness-aware multi-objective optimization, which is indeed commonly seen in real life, such as fair resource allocation problems and data driven multi-objective optimization problems. This paper aims to illuminate and broaden our understanding of multi-objective optimization from the perspective of fairness. To this end, we start with a discussion of user preferences in multi-objective optimization and then explore its relationship to fairness in machine learning and multi-objective optimization. Following the above discussions, representative cases of fairness-aware multiobjective optimization are presented, further elaborating the importance of fairness in traditional multi-objective optimization, data-driven optimization and federated optimization. Finally, challenges and opportunities in fairness-aware multi-objective optimization are addressed. We hope that this article makes a small step forward towards understanding fairness in the context of optimization and promote research interest in fairness-aware multi-objective optimization.
The deployment of the sensor nodes (SNs) always plays a decisive role in the system performance of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In this work, we propose an optimal deployment method for practical heterogeneous WSNs which gives a deep insight into the trade-off between the reliability and deployment cost. Specifically, this work aims to provide the optimal deployment of SNs to maximize the coverage degree and connection degree, and meanwhile minimize the overall deployment cost. In addition, this work fully considers the heterogeneity of SNs (i.e. differentiated sensing range and deployment cost) and three-dimensional (3-D) deployment scenarios. This is a multi-objective optimization problem, non-convex, multimodal and NP-hard. To solve it, we develop a novel swarm-based multi-objective optimization algorithm, known as the competitive multi-objective marine predators algorithm (CMOMPA) whose performance is verified by comprehensive comparative experiments with ten other stateof-the-art multi-objective optimization algorithms. The computational results demonstrate that CMOMPA is superior to others in terms of convergence and accuracy and shows excellent performance on multimodal multiobjective optimization problems. Sufficient simulations are also conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the CMOMPA based optimal SNs deployment method. The results show that the optimized deployment can balance the trade-off among deployment cost, sensing reliability and network reliability. The source code is available on https://github.com/iNet-WZU/CMOMPA.
Deep neural networks have been found vulnerable to adversarial attacks, thus raising potentially concerns in security-sensitive contexts. To address this problem, recent research has investigated the adversarial robustness of deep neural networks from the architectural point of view. However, searching for architectures of deep neural networks is computationally expensive, particularly when coupled with adversarial training process. To meet the above challenge, this paper proposes a bi-fidelity multiobjective neural architecture search approach. First, we formulate the NAS problem for enhancing adversarial robustness of deep neural networks into a multiobjective optimization problem. Specifically, in addition to a low-fidelity performance predictor as the first objective, we leverage an auxiliary-objective -- the value of which is the output of a surrogate model trained with high-fidelity evaluations. Secondly, we reduce the computational cost by combining three performance estimation methods, i.e., parameter sharing, low-fidelity evaluation, and surrogate-based predictor. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is confirmed by extensive experiments conducted on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and SVHN datasets.
As "a new frontier in evolutionary computation research", evolutionary transfer optimization(ETO) will overcome the traditional paradigm of zero reuse of related experience and knowledge from solved past problems in researches of evolutionary computation. In scheduling applications via ETO, a quite appealing and highly competitive framework "meeting" between them could be formed for both intelligent scheduling and green scheduling, especially for international pledge of "carbon neutrality" from China. To the best of our knowledge, our paper on scheduling here, serves as the 1st work of a class of ETO frameworks when multiobjective optimization problem "meets" single-objective optimization problems in discrete case (not multitasking optimization). More specifically, key knowledge conveyed for industrial applications, like positional building blocks with genetic algorithm based settings, could be used via the new core transfer mechanism and learning techniques for permutation flow shop scheduling problem(PFSP). Extensive studies on well-studied benchmarks validate firm effectiveness and great universality of our proposed ETO-PFSP framework empirically. Our investigations (1) enrich the ETO frameworks, (2) contribute to the classical and fundamental theory of building block for genetic algorithms and memetic algorithms, and (3) head towards the paradigm shift of evolutionary scheduling via learning by proposal and practice of paradigm of "knowledge and building-block based scheduling" (KAB2S) for "industrial intelligence" in China.
Recent decades have witnessed great advancements in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) for multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). However, these progressively improved MOEAs have not necessarily been equipped with scalable and learnable problem-solving strategies for new and grand challenges brought by the scaling-up MOPs with continuously increasing complexity from diverse aspects, mainly including expensive cost of function evaluations, many objectives, large-scale search space, time-varying environments, and multi-task. Under different scenarios, divergent thinking is required in designing new powerful MOEAs for solving them effectively. In this context, research studies on learnable MOEAs with machine learning techniques have received extensive attention in the field of evolutionary computation. This paper begins with a general taxonomy of scaling-up MOPs and learnable MOEAs, followed by an analysis of the challenges that these MOPs pose to traditional MOEAs. Then, we synthetically overview recent advances of learnable MOEAs in solving various scaling-up MOPs, focusing primarily on four attractive directions (i.e., learnable evolutionary discriminators for environmental selection, learnable evolutionary generators for reproduction, learnable evolutionary evaluators for function evaluations, and learnable evolutionary transfer modules for sharing or reusing optimization experience). The insight of learnable MOEAs is offered to readers as a reference to the general track of the efforts in this field.
A digital twin is a surrogate model that has the main feature to mirror the original process behavior. Associating the dynamical process with a digital twin model of reduced complexity has the significant advantage to map the dynamics with high accuracy and reduced costs in CPU time and hardware to timescales over which that suffers significantly changes and so it is difficult to explore. This paper introduces a new framework for creating efficient digital twin models of fluid flows. We introduce a novel algorithm that combines the advantages of Krylov based dynamic mode decomposition with proper orthogonal decomposition and outperforms the selection of the most influential modes. We prove that randomized orthogonal decomposition algorithm provides several advantages over SVD empirical orthogonal decomposition methods and mitigates the projection error formulating a multiobjective optimization problem.We involve the state-of-the-art artificial intelligence Deep Learning (DL) to perform a real-time adaptive calibration of the digital twin model, with increasing fidelity. The output is a high-fidelity DIGITAL TWIN DATA MODEL of the fluid flow dynamics, with the advantage of a reduced complexity. The new modelling tools are investigated in the numerical simulation of three wave phenomena with increasing complexity. We show that the outputs are consistent with the original source data.We perform a thorough assessment of the performance of the new digital twin data models, in terms of numerical accuracy and computational efficiency, including a time simulation response feature study.
In the era of industry 4.0, procurement in supply chain management is the key to developing information management systems. It directly affects production planning failure. In this case, it is the process to prepare and confirming the material inventory is in the ordinal stages and be able to produce the products in any production line. In terms of industrial informatics, it can provide information management approaches for leveraging data sharing between factories. The multiobjective optimization will be enabled by integrating material inventory, production planning and monitoring, and transportation planning collaboration. The material-inventory transportation problem is the virtual factory situation when production plan failure occurs. It becomes the cost to transport material between each factory and the distribution to clients. In this study, the question of the material-inventory transportation problem is: How can we transport other materials from one factory into another factory? This study proposed a model to find out about the adjustment of material inventory through transportation. The objective of this model is to minimize the whole production cost and total transportation cost.