← Fake News Detection
Papers with Code · CC BY-SA 4.0

FNC-1

아카이브 평가 10건 · 마지막 적재/변경

평가 기록

과거 수집 기록이며 최신 순위가 아닙니다. 데이터셋 버전·split·실험 조건과 지표 방향이 검증되지 않은 결과는 직접 비교할 수 없습니다. 날짜는 논문 날짜이며 최신 평가일을 뜻하지 않습니다.

표가 화면보다 넓으면 좌우로 스크롤하여 논문과 구현 링크를 확인하세요.

원본 기록 순서 · 순위 미부여
모델원본 지표·값논문구현
Sepúlveda-Torres R., Vicente M., Saquete E., Lloret E., Palomar M. (2021)
Weighted Accuracy
90.73
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
75.03
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
63.41
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
85.97
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
99.36
Exploring Summarization to Enhance Headline Stance Detection
2021-06-20
코드 1
ZAINAB A. JAWAD, AHMED J. OBAID (CNN and DNN with SCM, 2022)
Weighted Accuracy
84.60
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
88.47
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
96.00
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
87.70
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
95.04
Combination Of Convolution Neural Networks And Deep Neural Networks For Fake News Detection
2022-10-15
연결 없음
Bhatt et al.
Weighted Accuracy
83.08
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
43.82
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
6.31
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
85.68
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
98.04
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
2017-12-11
코드 1
Bi-LSTM (max-pooling, attention)
Weighted Accuracy
82.23
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
51.34
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
10.33
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
81.52
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
96.74
Combining Similarity Features and Deep Representation Learning for Stance Detection in the Context of Checking Fake News
2018-11-02
코드 1 · 코드 2 · 코드 3
3rd place at FNC-1 - Team UCL Machine Reading (Riedel et al., 2017)
Weighted Accuracy
81.72
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
44.04
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
6.60
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
81.38
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
97.90
A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task
2017-07-11
코드 1 · 코드 2 · 코드 3 · 코드 4 · 코드 5 · 코드 6 · 코드 7 · 코드 8 · 코드 9
Neural method from Mohtarami et al. + TF-IDF (Mohtarami et al., 2018)
Weighted Accuracy
81.23
Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks
2018-04-20
연결 없음
Neural method from Mohtarami et al. (Mohtarami et al., 2018)
Weighted Accuracy
78.97
Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks
2018-04-20
연결 없음
Baseline based on skip-thought embeddings (Bhatt et al., 2017)
Weighted Accuracy
76.18
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
31.80
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
0.00
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
81.20
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
91.18
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
2017-12-11
코드 1
Baseline based on word2vec + hand-crafted features (Bhatt et al., 2017)
Weighted Accuracy
72.78
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
50.70
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
9.61
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
53.38
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
96.05
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
2017-12-11
코드 1
Neural baseline based on bi-directional LSTMs (Bhatt et al., 2017)
Weighted Accuracy
63.11
Per-class Accuracy (Agree)
38.04
Per-class Accuracy (Disagree)
4.59
Per-class Accuracy (Discuss)
58.132
Per-class Accuracy (Unrelated)
78.27
On the Benefit of Combining Neural, Statistical and External Features for Fake News Identification
2017-12-11
코드 1